Universal Design for Learning



Initiative TitleUniversal Design for Learning
Submitted in Previous Year(s)No
Critical Information, Notes, Justification, Rationale

Secure resources and support for professional development and technologies that align with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles for teaching and learning.  A campus wide initiative to support UDL achieves multiple objectives...

  1. consistent with Title 2 federal regulations and ensures continued compliance
  2. support for all diverse learners as enrollment expands and opportunities are created for successful student outcomes
Consequences of this initiative not being funded
  • inability to maintain Title 2 accessibility status across all instruction
  • continued disparity in the learning experience for students 
Department GoalsCollaborate with the Office of Accessibility Services to expand professional development opportunities to cultivate accessibility knowledge and skill for instructors and staff
Programs
LocationsMain Campus
Estimated Completion Date05/31/2027
Will this initiative span multiple budget years?Yes
ImportanceHigh
Funding SourceGrant Possibility
Created12/10/2025 2:08 pm
Updated12/10/2025 2:08 pm

Institutional Goals

Goal How will the initiative support this institutional goal?
Provides framework for ethical inclusion and facilitation of the student expereince
Create framework and tools for faculty to adopt/deploy for instructional practices
Create a truly equitable learning experience for all students
Support diverse instructional practices that provide opportunities for successful outcomes for all
Support diverse instructional practices that provide opportunities for successful outcomes for all
Enhance student engagement and equitable access to learning
Support advanced/innovative teaching practices through awareness and professional development

Action Steps

Action Step Responsible Party Order
Source grant funding Dana Salkowsky and Grants office 1

Expected Outcomes

Outcome Order
Scaled integration of UDL principles across the curriculem 1

Assessment Methods

Method Description Other Method Responsible Party
Institutional Data Review both program and student data that is collected at the institutional level. Data can include program enrollment, retention, transfer, student GPA, etc. CTL

Resources

INITIAL YEAR COST: $50,000.00
RECURRING COST: $50,000.00

Equipment

Need Cost (Initial/Recurring) Supporting Departments
TOTAL: $0.00 / $0.00

Facility

Need Cost (Initial/Recurring) Supporting Departments
TOTAL: $0.00 / $0.00

Supply

Need Cost (Initial/Recurring) Supporting Departments
TOTAL: $0.00 / $0.00

Staffing

Need Cost (Initial/Recurring) Supporting Departments
TOTAL: $0.00 / $0.00

Training

Need Cost (Initial/Recurring) Supporting Departments
Resources and training from 3rd party expertise $50000.00 / 50000.00 (1st year)
  • Center for Teaching and Learning
TOTAL: $50,000.00 / $50,000.00

Marketing

Need Cost (Initial/Recurring) Supporting Departments
TOTAL: $0.00 / $0.00

Other

Need Cost (Initial/Recurring) Supporting Departments
TOTAL: $0.00 / $0.00

Prioritization

This is initiative is ready for prioritization.

Assessment

DateDepartment NameStatusCost to DateFunding Source 
No results found.