Initiative Title | Collaboration with CAPE in designing a seamless pathway for college matriculation of non-native speakers |
---|---|
Submitted in Previous Year(s) | No |
Critical Information, Notes, Justification, Rationale | Non-native English speakers are an increasing demographic in Orange County, and as such, constitute a cohort that may seek college entry. Â The current ESL Bridge program serves to provide a foundation for language acquisition, but at the conclusion of level 5, for those students who wish to earn a degree, a pathway into credit-bearing courses needs to be clearly established. |
Consequences of this initiative not being funded | Loss of this student population |
Department Goals | Continue and plan efforts to facilitate the progress of students toward completion of their stated academic goals |
Programs | AA Liberal Arts & Sciences/Humanities & SS, ESL Credit, Developmental Reading, Developmental Writing |
Locations | |
Estimated Completion Date | |
Will this initiative span multiple budget years? | Yes |
Importance | Medium |
Funding Source | Request for Prioritization |
Created | 11/07/2016 3:49 pm |
Updated | 11/17/2016 12:38 pm |
Goal | How will the initiative support this institutional goal? |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Action Step | Responsible Party | Order |
---|---|---|
Review the current curriculum in collaboration with the CAPE ESL coordinator of Bridge Levels 4, 5 to avoid duplication in WRT 020 and RDG 080 | Department ESL liaison, ESL CAPE coordinator | 1 |
Outcome | Order |
---|---|
Increased enrollment and retention of non-native speakers in College programs | 1 |
Method | Description | Other Method | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|---|
Rubrics/ Scoring Guides | Rubrics/scoring guides outline identified criteria for successfully completing an activity, assignment, etc. and establish levels for meeting the criteria. They can be used to score everything from essays, engagement, to performances. | CAPE ESL Coordinator in conjunction with English Dept. liaison and department committee members |
INITIAL YEAR COST: | $0.00 |
---|---|
RECURRING COST: | $0.00 |
Need | Cost (Initial/Recurring) | Supporting Departments | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL: | $0.00 / $0.00 |
Need | Cost (Initial/Recurring) | Supporting Departments | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL: | $0.00 / $0.00 |
Need | Cost (Initial/Recurring) | Supporting Departments | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL: | $0.00 / $0.00 |
Need | Cost (Initial/Recurring) | Supporting Departments | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL: | $0.00 / $0.00 |
Need | Cost (Initial/Recurring) | Supporting Departments | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL: | $0.00 / $0.00 |
Need | Cost (Initial/Recurring) | Supporting Departments | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL: | $0.00 / $0.00 |
Need | Cost (Initial/Recurring) | Supporting Departments | |
---|---|---|---|
TOTAL: | $0.00 / $0.00 |
This initiative is not ready for prioritization.
Date | Department Name | Status | Cost to Date | Funding Source | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No results found. |