Security Vulnerabilities:

• End of Security Updates: With Microsoft ceasing support for Windows 10 in October 2025, critical security patches and bug fixes will no longer be released for that operating system. This leaves campus systems vulnerable to cyberattacks, malware, and ransomware, which could compromise sensitive student, faculty, and administrative data.
• Data Breaches: Unpatched vulnerabilities will make it easier for hackers to exploit systems, potentially leading to data breaches or loss of confidential information.

2. Compatibility Issues:

• Inability to Use New Software and Applications: Future software, including educational tools, applications, and operating system updates, may no longer be compatible with Windows 10. This can hinder productivity and limit access to essential tools for students, faculty, and staff.
• Missed Features in New Technologies: As Windows 11 integrates with emerging technologies like AI, machine learning, and the latest cloud solutions, staying on Windows 10 means missing out on these advanced features, which could put the campus at a disadvantage in terms of IT capabilities.

3. Increased IT Maintenance Costs:

• Higher Support Costs: Once Windows 10 reaches its end-of-life, troubleshooting and fixing issues without official support can become more time-consuming and expensive. IT teams will need to devote extra resources to managing outdated systems.
• Strain on IT Resources: Supporting an outdated operating system can lead to inefficiencies, as IT staff will need to focus on maintaining and patching unsupported systems instead of innovating or supporting other critical campus initiatives.

4. Decreased Productivity:

• Slower Performance: Over time, older systems running unsupported software may experience performance degradation. This can lead to slower boot times, reduced system responsiveness, and crashes, all of which disrupt workflows for faculty, staff, and students.
• Frustration Among Users: Users may face difficulties with an aging operating system, including compatibility issues with newer software, hardware, and peripheral devices, which can create frustration and reduce overall productivity on campus.

5. Compliance Risks:

• Non-compliance with Industry Standards: Many industries, including education, have specific standards for data security and technology infrastructure. Running outdated software could result in non-compliance with these standards, leading to potential legal or regulatory repercussions.
• Accreditation and Audit Concerns: Campuses must maintain up-to-date systems to meet the expectations of accreditation bodies and audits. An outdated system could reflect poorly on audits, possibly impacting the institution's reputation.

6. Lost Opportunities for Innovation:

• Missed Technological Advancements: Windows 11 includes advancements in areas like virtual desktops, accessibility, and remote work capabilities. Without upgrading, the campus may miss out on innovative tools that could enhance learning, teaching, and administrative processes.
• Lack of Support for Remote Learning: As the hybrid learning model continues to evolve, Windows 11 offers features that support remote learning, virtual collaboration, and integrated educational tools. Not upgrading could hinder the ability to offer these enhanced experiences to students and faculty.

7. Reputation and Competitiveness:

• Perception of Technological Backwardness: Staying on Windows 10 may give the impression that the campus is falling behind in terms of technology. Prospective students and faculty may view the institution as less modern or innovative compared to peers using the latest systems.
• Recruitment and Retention: Technology plays a significant role in attracting both students and faculty. A failure to upgrade could impact recruitment efforts, as prospective members of the campus community may look elsewhere for a more tech-forward environment.

In summary, failing to upgrade to Windows 11 would create significant security, performance, compliance, and operational challenges, ultimately impacting productivity, IT efficiency, and the campus’s reputation. It would also risk leaving the campus vulnerable to evolving technological needs and threats.